Deer Park, NY
Client portal coming soon
Our online client portal is on the way. In the meantime, our team is happy to help — just reach out.
Contact us
You hold the keys to other people’s networks. When a project fails, the client sues over what you promised; when a breach happens, the client sues over what you were protecting — and if you’re a managed service provider, one compromise can reach every client at once.
A technology consultant’s program is built on combined technology E&O and cyber liability — one form covering both failure to perform and security failure, because clients rarely plead only one. The provisions that decide real outcomes: whether contractual liability is covered (your SLAs and uplift obligations often aren’t), whether your work on client systems is covered when their network is breached, and — for MSPs — whether the policy contemplates aggregation across your entire client base. Add first-party cyber for your own ransomware and interruption, and New York’s mandatory workers’ comp, DBL, and Paid Family Leave.
Implementation, custom development, and integration work — where claims are about scope, schedule, and whether the delivered system does what the statement of work said. Failure-to-perform claims dominate, and limitation-of-liability clauses are the best defense available.
Ongoing administration of client networks, backups, and security. The defining exposure is aggregation: a compromise of your remote management tooling can reach every client simultaneously, turning one incident into a portfolio of claims.
Your software is the service, so an outage or defect is a claim from every customer at once. Contractual uptime commitments, data handling obligations, and IP infringement allegations shape a program that looks more like a products account than a consulting one.
Most firms drift across these categories — the project consultant who begins hosting, the MSP who writes custom code, the developer who starts handling client data. Each move changes what the policy needs to say, and technology programs are unusually unforgiving about services performed but never declared.
Failure to perform and security failure are one claim. Clients don’t separate a project that went wrong from a breach that followed; the complaint alleges both. Combined technology E&O and cyber avoids the gap between two policies each pointing at the other, which is the most common structural failure in this class.
Your contract is your risk plan. A limitation-of-liability clause capping damages at fees paid, a mutual indemnity, a disclaimer of consequential damages, and a defined scope do more to protect a technology firm than any endorsement. Enterprise clients will push back — but signing unlimited liability creates exposure no policy will fully answer.
For MSPs, one compromise reaches everyone. Remote monitoring and management tools, shared credentials, and privileged access mean an attacker who reaches you reaches your clients. Carriers underwrite this aggregation directly, and controls like privileged-access management, tenant isolation, and MFA on management tooling are now table stakes rather than differentiators.
You are judged on the security you were hired to provide. When a client is breached, the question is what you agreed to monitor, patch, back up, or protect — and whether you did. Documented scope, change logs, patching records, and backup verification are simultaneously the service and the defense.
Your own operations are a first-party exposure. Ransomware in your environment stops billable work, corrupts your tooling, and may reach client systems. First-party cyber — restoration, business interruption, extortion response — matters as much as the liability side for a firm whose product is uptime.
Cloud dependency is a business interruption risk. When the hosting provider, platform, or cloud region goes down, your clients lose service and look to you. Dependent or contingent business interruption coverage addresses an outage you didn’t cause and can’t fix.
Code and content carry IP exposure. Open-source license compliance, third-party components, copied content, and trademark issues create infringement claims — which is why intellectual property and media liability belong in the coverage conversation for anyone shipping software or content.
The core policy, covering failure to perform and security failure on one form with shared limits and defense — the structure that prevents two carriers from pointing at each other.
Your own ransomware, extortion, forensics, restoration, and business interruption — the coverage a consultancy needs for itself, not just for its clients.
How much of your contractual obligation the policy will actually answer for — read against the agreements you sign, because uncapped liability is largely uninsurable.
Workers’ compensation for staff, plus New York’s DBL and Paid Family Leave — mandatory from the first employee, including remote workers.
Loss caused by an outage at your cloud, hosting, or platform provider — an exposure that grows every year and that base forms don’t always include.
Infringement, open-source compliance, and content claims arising from software, sites, and materials you produce.
Fraudulently induced payments — including vendor-impersonation invoices and payroll diversion — that standard crime forms typically exclude.
How the policy treats one event affecting many clients: a single occurrence, or many? For an MSP this provision can matter more than the limit itself.
Office contents, equipment, and general liability — plus business income for a firm whose people can work anywhere but whose systems still matter.
Contractor classification, remote-work wage questions, equity and compensation disputes, and a competitive hiring market that produces departures and claims.
Staff driving to client sites in personal vehicles — inexpensive coverage for a routine activity.
Excess over general liability and auto — separate from the technology policy, which needs its own excess when enterprise contracts demand higher limits.
The exposure base, weighted by what you actually do: staffing and advisory work rates below implementation, which rates below managed services and hosting.
Whether you serve healthcare, financial services, or government clients, and what data you touch — record counts and data sensitivity drive the cyber side directly.
Whether you use written agreements with limitation-of-liability clauses and defined scope. Carriers ask, and firms that sign whatever the client sends pay for it in both premium and outcomes.
Multi-factor authentication everywhere, endpoint detection, privileged access management, tested and segregated backups, and patching discipline — now underwritten as prerequisites rather than credited as discounts.
For managed providers: how many clients, what access you hold, whether tenants are isolated, and how remote management tooling is secured — the aggregation questions that determine both appetite and price.
Prior claims, prior incidents even without claims, and how they were handled. In this class, an incident handled well and documented reads better than a clean sheet with no evidence of preparedness.
Directionally: a small consultancy’s combined technology E&O and cyber often starts in the low four figures, MSPs with meaningful client counts price well above that on aggregation, and firms handling regulated data or committing to uptime SLAs scale further — but services, contracts, and security controls swing every number, which is why technology firms are quoted on how they work, not on how many people they employ.
The two claims that define this industry: the MSP compromise that reaches every client at once — where a single intrusion into remote management tooling produces simultaneous claims across the client base, and the questions become whether the policy treats it as one occurrence or many and whether the limit contemplated the portfolio rather than the account; and the failed implementation, where a project overruns or underdelivers, the client claims consequential and business losses, and the outcome turns almost entirely on whether the contract capped liability and defined scope. One is survived with aggregation-aware limits and hard security controls; the other is prevented by a clause negotiated before the work started.
A Long Island perspective: Long Island’s technology sector is built around serving other local businesses — MSPs supporting medical practices, law firms, manufacturers, and municipalities across Nassau and Suffolk, alongside development shops and specialized consultancies. That client mix concentrates regulated data: healthcare records, escrow and financial data, and public-sector systems all sit behind the same providers. It also means enterprise-style contract requirements now reach small firms, with clients demanding specific limits, additional insured status, and security attestations that the insurance program has to actually support.
Why technology firms work with GCI: technology E&O and cyber forms differ dramatically in the places that matter — contractual liability treatment, coverage for work performed on client systems, aggregation for MSPs, dependent business interruption, and IP. As an independent brokerage, Group Coverage, Inc. reads those provisions carrier by carrier, matches the program to the services you actually perform, helps you see which client contract terms your coverage can support before you sign them, and coordinates New York’s employer stack — with benefits, our founding practice, quoted alongside.
For the security and practice side, see the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency on managed service provider security, and the Insurance Information Institute on business coverage basics.
For an MSP, that number is the whole underwriting conversation — and most policies weren’t written with it in mind. Group Coverage, Inc. builds technology programs around the services you actually perform, reads the aggregation and contractual liability terms carrier by carrier, matches your coverage to what client contracts demand, and coordinates New York’s employer stack.
This page is for general educational purposes and is not legal advice. Coverage terms, claims-made provisions, exclusions, contractual liability treatment, and pricing factors vary by carrier, service model, and jurisdiction. Consult qualified counsel regarding client contract terms, and review your specific policy documents or speak with a licensed advisor to understand how these concepts apply to your firm.
© 2026 Group Coverage, Inc. All rights reserved.
